CAT 336 vs Komatsu PC360: 36-Ton Heavy Mining Excavator Comparison

Share On Social

Choosing between these two machines ultimately depends on your primary duty cycle. The CAT 336 dominates extreme hard-rock stripping and high-frequency hammer work. Its 37,200 kg reinforced frame, Cat C9.3 ACERT engine at 234 kW, and heavy-duty box-section boom handle 185–195 mm hydraulic hammers without fatigue cracking. Meanwhile, the Komatsu PC360 excels at bulk-loading and fuel economy. Its rapid swing acceleration and CLSS hydraulics cut per-cycle time by 0.8 seconds, saving $9,200–10,500 in annual diesel costs. For a broader look at this machine class, explore our 30-ton excavators for sale inventory.

Excavator Mechanical Inspection Guide
Pre-export mechanical inspection: pump pressure, blow-by and undercarriage life are checked on every CAT 336 and Komatsu PC360 unit.

Technical Specification Matrix: CAT 336 vs. Komatsu PC360

Here is a side-by-side breakdown of the core specs:

ParameterCAT 336Komatsu PC360
Operating Weight37,200 kg35,600 kg
EngineCat C9.3 ACERTKomatsu SAA6D114E
Engine Output234 kW (314 hp)202 kW (271 hp)
Total Hydraulic Flow568 L/min535 L/min
Main Relief Pressure35.0 MPa37.3 MPa
Bucket Digging Force232 kN227 kN
Standard Bucket Capacity1.88–2.28 m³1.6–1.9 m³
Ground Pressure58.0 kPa55.4 kPa
Used Caterpillar CAT 336 Excavator – Made in Japan, Low Hours (4)
The CAT 336 — 37,200 kg, Cat C9.3 ACERT, 234 kW (314 hp).

Engine Displacement & Low-RPM High-Torque Delivery

The Cat C9.3’s 9.3-liter displacement builds enormous low-RPM torque reserve. Consequently, it maintains pressure even during deep prying in granite or dense basalt formations. Furthermore, it sustains hydraulic output without surging under prolonged hammer loads. For a full breakdown of power curves and lift capacities, read our complete CAT 336 specs guide.

Heavy Quarry Breaker Impact vs. Dump Truck Bulk-Loading Speed

CAT 336: Heavy Counterweight & Structural Overbuilding for Hard Rock

The CAT 336’s extra 1,600 kg of operating mass acts as a natural damper. Therefore, the machine absorbs high-frequency recoil from large hydraulic hammers without rear-lifting. Moreover, its cast-steel boom pivot plates resist stress fractures during continuous granite splitting. As a result, downtime from structural fatigue drops significantly over a 10,000-hour service life. If your quarry relies heavily on breaker work, the used CAT 336 excavator in our inventory is built exactly for that environment.

Komatsu PC360: Fast Swing Acceleration & 40-Ton Hauler Production

The Komatsu PC360 uses dual-circuit CLSS closed-center hydraulics for seamless multi-function coordination. Specifically, boom-lift and swing movements combine without pressure drop or hesitation. As a result, each 90-degree swing cycle completes roughly 0.8 seconds faster than the CAT 336. Over a full shift, this speed advantage loads a 40-ton hauler 25–35 seconds faster per truck. Additionally, the 10.2 rpm swing speed maintains momentum even at high loading frequency. If bulk-loading output is your top priority, check out the used Komatsu PC360 excavator currently available.

Mining Fuel Burn Rates & Total Operating Economy

Fuel cost is a major factor in long-term mine profitability. Here is how these two machines compare in real mining conditions:

Duty CycleCAT 336Komatsu PC360
Heavy rock digging~29.5 L/hr~25.8 L/hr
Continuous breaker work~33.5 L/hr~29.0 L/hr

At 2,500 annual mining hours, the Komatsu saves roughly 9,250 liters of diesel. Consequently, operators typically recover $9,200–10,500 per year in fuel expenditure alone. Furthermore, the PC360’s dual-stage air filtration and separate hydraulic oil cooling fan reduce heat-related power loss in high-dust environments. In contrast, the CAT 336 prioritizes raw output over efficiency in extreme-load scenarios.

Hydraulic System Of Excavator Common Issues And Solutions (2)
Hydraulic troubleshooting: check main pump pressure, control-valve leakage and cylinder drift on both the CAT 336 and Komatsu PC360 before committing.

Secondary Market Valuation & Resale Pricing

Both models hold strong residual value, yet each serves a different buyer profile.

Machine HoursCAT 336Komatsu PC360
~4,000 hrs (premium)$92,000–108,000$78,000–92,000
~7,500 hrs (standard)$68,000–88,000$58,000–76,000
11,000+ hrs (high-use)$42,000–56,000$36,000–50,000

The CAT 336 commands a 10–15% brand premium at global mining auctions. Additionally, its parts ecosystem supports fast liquidation in Africa, Australia, and Latin America. The Komatsu PC360, however, offers roughly 12% lower acquisition cost at comparable hours. For a detailed breakdown of pricing trends and resale benchmarks, read our Komatsu PC360 excavator price guide.

Final Procurement Decision Checklist

Choose the CAT 336 when:

  • Breaker attachment usage exceeds 35% of total working hours
  • The site involves hard granite, basalt, or dense limestone formations
  • You need a 2.2 m³ heavy-duty rock bucket for coarse material
  • Structural fatigue resistance is a non-negotiable project requirement

Choose the Komatsu PC360 when:

  • Maximizing truck-loading cycles per shift is the primary KPI
  • Fuel spend represents a large share of your operating budget
  • The material mix includes blasted spoil, loose rock, or mixed earth
  • Operators prefer lighter, more responsive machine handling
Excavator Fuel Consumption Boosting Efficiency (2)
Fuel economy is a real operating cost: over a full working year the Komatsu PC360 and CAT 336 diverge markedly in litres burned per hour.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Which 36-ton excavator handles continuous rock breaker operations better?
— The CAT 336 leads in breaker endurance. Its 37,200 kg weight, heavy ballast counterweight, and reinforced box-section boom absorb the recoil of 185–195 mm hammers. Consequently, long-term structural fatigue remains minimal in demanding quarry applications.

Q2: How much fuel does the Komatsu PC360 save compared to the CAT 336?
— The Komatsu PC360 burns approximately 25.8 L/hr during heavy digging, versus 29.5 L/hr for the CAT 336. Therefore, across 2,500 annual mining hours, operators save roughly $9,200–10,500 in diesel expenditure.

Q3: Which machine delivers faster loading cycles for 30–40 ton dump trucks?
— The Komatsu PC360 completes swing cycles about 0.8 seconds faster due to its CLSS hydraulics and high swing rpm. As a result, it loads a 40-ton hauler 25–35 seconds faster per truck compared to the CAT 336.

Q4: What are the main engine output differences between these two models?
— The CAT 336 uses a 9.3-liter Cat C9.3 ACERT engine producing 234 kW (314 hp). Moreover, it delivers strong low-RPM torque for deep prying loads. In contrast, the Komatsu PC360 uses an 8.27-liter SAA6D114E engine at 202 kW (271 hp), optimized for fast throttle response and lower fuel burn.

Q5: What is the typical price difference for used 36-ton models in the secondary market?
— At mid-life condition (around 5,000–6,500 hours), a used CAT 336 typically sells for $68,000–88,000. Meanwhile, an equivalent Komatsu PC360 sells for $58,000–76,000, representing roughly a 12% lower capital acquisition cost.

Excavator Inspection Before Buying
Before buying: confirm hour-meter authenticity, track and idler wear, and service records on both the CAT 336 and Komatsu PC360.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0
Scroll to Top

Please share with us more information, so we can come up with a SOLUTION.